Sunset Crysler Farm

Sunset Crysler Farm
The end of a hot day!

Thursday 26 January 2012

Croghan medal last for War of 1812


This year marks the bicentennial of the War of 1812, which began in June of that year. The British refusal to honor the neutral rights of American ships on the high seas led to a declaration of war by Congress and until the peace treaty was signed in late 1814, a series of battles on land and sea marked the struggle between Britain and the United States.
Land victories against the British in the East were few and far between, but in the West the force of American arms did much better after some initial setbacks. The situation was so bad in the East that malcontents in New England actually set about to secede from the Union.
In the then northwestern part of the United States in the early 1790s, Britain had failed to honor the 1783 Treaty of Peace ending the Revolutionary War. It had continued to occupy a portion of what is now Michigan as well as sending agents into other areas to stir up the Indians against American rule. In 1796 the British finally withdrew but continued to foment trouble on the frontier by furnishing military supplies to Indian tribes.
The British interference in the Old Northwest continued to rankle territorial governments and in 1811 matters boiled over when Indiana Territorial Governor William Henry Harrison marched against the growing menace of the Indian confederation led by Tecumseh. The Battle of Tippecanoe in late 1811 was a prelude to the open warfare that erupted in the summer of 1812. (Tecumseh was not at the battle, as he was elsewhere raising men for his cause. His brother, The Prophet, was left in charge and proved a disaster as a leader.)
Medals: The Researcher's Guide
Military and civil awards, orders, decorations and medals, from 1793 to 1992!
Harrison’s bold thrust against the Indian confederation, however, effectively destroyed the Indian power base and for the rest of the War of 1812 the rebellious Indian tribes played only a marginal role though many of the braves joined the British army as irregulars.
One of Harrison’s officers at Tippecanoe was George Croghan, born near Louisville in 1791. A precocious student, he graduated at the age of 18 from William and Mary College in Virginia. Croghan then returned to Louisville, not long before Harrison called for volunteers in the planned raid against the Indian confederation. Croghan was so pleased with his military experience at Tippecanoe that he enlisted in the regular army early in 1812, obtaining a captain’s commission because of his earlier experience.
At the beginning of the war the force of American arms in the West was feeble at best. Not long after the conflict began British troops crossed into the Michigan Territory and easily captured Detroit. The city was supposedly well defended with plenty of supplies but inexplicably surrendered with little or no resistance. It was a black eye for the American army and matters soon got worse.
With the winter of 1812-1813 out of the way, British Brigadier General Henry Proctor mounted an offensive towards Ohio, with the intention of splitting the United States in the West. He first attacked Fort Meigs (near present-day Toledo, Ohio) but stiff resistance by the defenders disrupted Proctor’s plans. Leaving several hundred troops, including some of his Indian allies, to lay siege to Fort Meigs, Proctor pushed on to defeat any elements of the American army that might oppose him.
By this time the government in Washington realized that strong leadership was required in the West and William Henry Harrison was given a key role in defending this area. He arranged for a fort, named Stephenson, to be built a few miles north of modern Upper Sandusky, Ohio. It was small and cramped, having room for barely 200 officers and men. It had only one small artillery piece and was designed primarily as a defense against marauding Indian tribes.
Facing an attack by Proctor, whose force consisted of British regulars and disaffected Indians, Harrison held a council of war at Fort Stephenson. It was decided to build a new fort, with better defenses, a short distance from Fort Stephenson. George Croghan, who by now had been promoted to colonel, was placed in charge.

By late July 1813 Colonel Croghan was well under way in his efforts to build a new fort when alarming news reached Gen. Harrison. The British were making better time than expected and Proctor had pulled his troops from the siege at Fort Meigs to increase the strength of his army; it took time for the soldiers to be collected at one point, however, which gave Harrison limited breathing room.
With this new and larger enemy army aiming towards the small American force, Harrison convened another council of war to determine the best way to proceed. It was decided that Fort Stephenson, and any improvements put into place by Col. Croghan, should be abandoned at once. The fort was to be torched so that it could not be used by the British.
Harrison quickly wrote a dispatch to Croghan ordering him to retreat. The courier left on the evening of July 29 but got lost in the woods and did not find the proper route for several hours. As a result the orders did not reach Col. Croghan until late in the morning on July 30.
The new orders put Croghan in a very difficult position. His scouts had found the British columns to be moving rapidly towards him. Croghan could have ordered a retreat but it was likely that only his mounted troops could have moved quickly enough to escape capture. The bulk of his force was on foot and easy prey for the Indians accompanying Proctor.
It was also known to Croghan that Proctor had been unable to control his Indian allies at an earlier battle at Raisin River, when a considerable number of American prisoners had been tortured and murdered by the Indians. Given the likelihood that the Raisin River massacre would be repeated at Fort Stephenson, Croghan reluctantly replied to Harrison in the following words: “Sir, I have just received yours of yesterday, 10 o’clock p.m. ordering me to destroy this place and make good my retreat, which was received too late to be carried into execution. We have determined to maintain this place, and by heavens we can.”
Technically the answer bordered on insubordination and Harrison acted accordingly when he received Croghan’s answer. The colonel was promptly relieved of his command and the responsibility given to another officer, Col. Ball. The new commander set out at once for Fort Stephenson, accompanied by mounted dragoons, but was ambushed near the fort. The dragoons, however, proved more than a match for the Indian braves and Ball arrived safely at Fort Stephenson.
Colonel Croghan now left the fort to report to Harrison. Once the situation had been fully explained Harrison reinstated Croghan in his command. The colonel promptly returned to Fort Stephenson, whose defenses were being strengthened in lieu of building the other fort nearby. Upon his arrival at the fort he was informed by scouts that the British were very close. Within a matter of hours Gen. Proctor had arrived in force and retreat was now impossible even for mounted troops.
The arrival of the enemy proved to be worse than expected by Croghan. Proctor had been able to bring in several pieces of artillery by using gunboats on the Sandusky River, which came close to Fort Stephenson. Croghan had exactly one piece of artillery, a six-pounder that was moved around the perimeter of the fort to give the impression of several such guns.
On Aug. 1 both sides prepared for battle, Croghan having refused to surrender under the flag of truce requested by Proctor. The latter had 1,300 troops under his command, including 800 Indians. He also had another 2,000 Indians stationed to the west to prevent the soldiers from Fort Meigs coming to the aid of Croghan. The Americans, on the other hand, had barely 200 men and the one field piece.
The opening attack on Aug. 2 saw Proctor bombarding the fort with his cannons but he also used one of his gunboats to add to the firepower. For his part Croghan ordered that a hidden gun port be constructed along the line of the expected infantry attack and good supply of nails and grape shot made ready.
The enemy guns did little damage to Croghan’s defenses and Proctor ordered an all-out assault. The first waves were a feint against the south side of the fort but in short order came the real thrust at the northwest corner, where Croghan had his hidden gun port. As the troops approached Croghan opened fire with deadly accuracy, killing and wounding more than 150; the Americans had one man killed and seven wounded.
General Proctor now received the unwelcome information from his scouts that Harrison was preparing to march against the British rear. The siege was abruptly broken off and Proctor hurriedly retreated, leaving large quantities of military stores behind. The battle was over and the British never again seriously threatened the Old Northwest.
Colonel Croghan served with distinction during the rest of the war and remained in the army until he resigned his commission in 1817. He later changed his mind and rejoined in 1824, serving until his death at New Orleans in January 1849.
During and after the war Congress approved several gold medals for actions on both land and sea. None for Col. Croghan was considered at the time, however. In a belated recognition of his bravery the legislators did approve a gold medal for the defense of Fort Stephenson in February 1835, the last War of 1812 medal to be awarded.
Within a matter of weeks the War Department asked Lt. Washington Hood to prepare a proper design for the reverse of the medal. (The obverse was to carry Croghan’s portrait.) The Hood sketch varied considerably from the other army medals in that it had a Latin phrase, PARS MAGNA FUIT (“His Share was Great”) above the scene of the battle.
The use of a Latin motto is curious as none of the other army medals had carried such mottoes. The naval medals did and perhaps the army was indicating that they understood classical allusions as well as the navy.
Hood’s design was forwarded to the War Department in early May 1835, where it was soon approved but President Andrew Jackson was also consulted and he viewed the sketch with favor. On May 24 the drawing was sent to Mint Director Samuel Moore at Philadelphia; Moore was instructed to have the dies made and the medal struck as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the matter was overlooked during a change in directorship in early July 1835. Moore resigned and was replaced by Dr. Robert M. Patterson.
Secretary of War Lewis Cass grew impatient when he had heard nothing for several weeks and wrote Patterson on Aug. 24 asking what had been done. The War Department had indicated that Moritz Furst, who had done nearly all of the earlier War of 1812 dies, was to prepare Croghan’s as well and Cass also wanted to know if Furst had been located.
Director Patterson soon replied, apologizing for the delay and noting that he had been unable to locate Furst. On Sept. 4 Patterson again wrote Cass, admitting that he had yet to locate the artist. On the following day the Mint director wrote Col. Croghan letting him know what was transpiring and indicating that Furst, when found, would want to draw Croghan from life before cutting the obverse die.
In due course Patterson discovered that Furst was in New York and was able to contact him. The artist arrived at the Mint on Sept. 24 for a personal interview with the director. The price agreed upon for the pair of dies was $1,800. Furst examined the Hood drawing and said that it could be followed with the exception of the ornamental border. Patterson agreed with Furst and notified the War Department of the proposed arrangement; it was soon accepted and on Oct. 9 Furst was given the go-ahead.
The agreement required the artist to finish the dies by February 1836 but without the responsibility for hardening the dies. That would be done by Chief Coiner Adam Eckfeldt and, if there was a failure, Furst was to replace the reverse die for $600. If it was the obverse die, there would be no charge. (The latter stipulation seems to indicate that Furst intended to make a hub of the portrait.)
Furst began his work with the reverse die in late October 1836 because he had not yet made arrangements with Col. Croghan for a personal sitting. The arrangement did not work out exactly as planned, however, as it proved impossible for Croghan to visit New York. Instead the colonel instructed his brother in Pittsburgh to send a profile miniature to Furst. The artist agreed to the proposal by Croghan as the best that could be done under the circumstances.
The artist received the miniature in mid February 1836 and work went rapidly after that. By late March both dies had been received at the Mint and Furst was paid the $1,800 due him.
As early as September 1835 Chief Coiner Eckfeldt had estimated that it would cost about $250 to strike the gold medal, which would include the cost of the gold, the case and labor. The actual invoice has not been found for the Croghan medal, however.
Although the dies were on hand by April 1836 nothing was done for some months. In January 1837 the Secretary of War wrote to Director Patterson asking why the medal had not been finished, given the amount of time involved. The director in turn asked Chief Coiner Eckfeldt about the status of this matter and was informed that the medal would be ready in about two weeks. The War Department accepted this and so informed the President and other key officials.
At this point nothing again happened and on March 13 an irritated secretary of War pointedly asked Patterson how much longer the wait would be. On the 16th Patterson replied that the delay was due to an “excess of caution” on Eckfeldt’s part. However, the director was able to report that the medal had just been struck and was being prepared for shipment to Washington.
Within a short time Col. Croghan had indeed received the honor which was so long overdue. In addition several of the officers and men who had distinguished themselves in the battle received specially engraved swords.
Beginning in 1861 the Mint struck copper-bronzed copies of the medal from the original dies. The medal continued to be struck after 1901 for collectors but in the so-called Late Bronze finish. The Croghan medals, however, have not been struck at the Mint for some years and at present can be obtained only on the secondary market.

War of 1812 Bicentennial a significant landmark

War of 1812 Bicentennial a significant landmark

by administrator

Posted Jan 19, 2012 By Jeff Maguire

EMC Lifestyle - As a history buff I am always interested in anniversaries of major events which have occurred over the course of time.
My wife and I spend a lot of time in the United Kingdom and since both of us love history it's a great destination. There are literally more historic connections around every corner in Great Britain and Continental Europe!
In terms of world history North America remains one of the new kids on the block. This continent was settled relatively recently. Although our history is intrinsically tied to that of Europe, simply because our ancestors came mainly from that continent, we can't begin to match the number of historic sites and buildings available overseas.
On the other hand our shorter history is intriguing and because it is fresh it is also relatively well documented, something that offers a huge advantage to students for instance.
Last spring I wrote a column to coincide with the opening shots of the American Civil War fired 150 years earlier. The Sesquicentennial of the conflict between North and South is being observed over the course of four years, ending in April 2015.
The Civil War began with the shelling (by Confederate artillery) of Union-held Fort Sumter in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina, April 12, 1861. It ended almost exactly four years later when Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union General Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia on April 9, 1865.
The Americans are marking the Sesquicentennial with a variety of events which will continue until the anniversary of the surrender more than three years from now.
The year that just dawned marks the Bicentennial (200th anniversary) of yet another four-year long war which, although it involved the United States, was far more significant to Canada and Canadians. The 'War of 1812' was the last war ever fought between our neighbouring countries although, officially, Canada didn't become an independent nation until 55 years later.
I can't profess to be extremely knowledgeable about the War of 1812 although I probably possess far more background than most Canadians. My mother grew up in Stoney Creek, Ontario near Hamilton and some of the most significant fighting of the war occurred in the Niagara region. Very early in life I learned about Major General Isaac Brock and the Battle of Queenston Heights. It's a lesson which has stuck with me through my life.
For the record that particular conflict, the first major battle of the war, occurred on Oct. 13, 1812 at Queenston, five kilometres from Niagara Falls. It was a British victory, but Brock was one of more than 120 (from both sides) who died during the fighting.
Brock's monument, a landmark at Queenston, is getting a facelift for the Bicentennial.
MAJOR EVENT
Not surprisingly the Canadian government is putting a major emphasis on this particular anniversary. They want us to remember and honour how Canadians from diverse backgrounds and various regions came together to fight and ensure the eventual independent destiny of this country.
The truth is that if the War of 1812 (it lasted until 1815) had not ended in victory for the British and their allies, Canada would not exist. The objective of the Americans was to defeat the same enemy they had beaten in the Revolutionary War. To me it stands to reason they would then have expanded into what remained of British North America (Upper and Lower Canada). Eventually it's almost certain Americans would have colonized the remainder of what is now this country.
So, a significant anniversary indeed!
Personally I believe in "fighting" one battle at a time. So no, I won't be railing against the education system for failing to teach our young people details of the War of 1812. To be honest I'm not sure how much - or how little - of this particular chapter in Canadian history is being taught in our schools?
On the other hand I would consider it a major victory if the system did a better job of teaching the more recent history of the two world wars. The wars of the 20th Century, after all, impacted on many Canadians who are still living. Yet recent polls show the majority of young Canadians know little or nothing about wars which shaped the modern world they now live in. This general lack of knowledge is a national disgrace in my opinion!
Most Canadians will also tell you that we have been fortunate "never to have a major war fought on our soil."
I think it's a matter of definition.
In modern times at least our country and our continent have been fortunate to avoid the direct impact of war. But with so many Canadian lives sacrificed during the wars of the 20th Century it would be very wrong to say "we escaped the effects of war."
As for the War of 1812, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government are definitely taking the anniversary seriously.
A significant budget of $28 million has been put in place and will be used over the course of the next four years. Included in the War of 1812 project is an educational campaign (something I welcome), the re-enactment of historic battles, festivals centred on the war as well as a permanent memorial which will be erected in the Ottawa region.
In addition infrastructure work, including upgrades to historic forts which played a role in the conflict and existing memorials (including Brock's monument) will be undertaken.
Plans also call for the issuance of stamps and coins to mark the Bicentennial of the war.
In a statement late last year Harper said the war was instrumental in establishing Canada's military. He noted that many militia regiments still in existence in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes can trace their roots back to the War of 1812.
"The war helped establish our path toward becoming an independent and free country, united under the Crown with a respect for linguistic and ethnic diversity," Harper says.
"The heroic efforts of Canadians then helped define who we are today, what side of the border we live on and which flag we salute," the PM states.
There is no doubt that despite the fact it wasn't a major conflict by world standards, the War of 1812 had a huge impact on our country from military, political and cultural points of view. The result helped lay the foundation for Canadian Confederation in 1867, not to mention Canada's border with the U.S. The imaginary line we like to call "the longest undefended border in the world."
Clearly it wasn't always so!
The Rideau Canal, now a UNESCO World Heritage Site, was built by Colonel John By (the founder of Ottawa) and the Royal Engineers, for defensive purposes. Opened in 1832 it was constructed as a precaution to facilitate the movement of troops and supplies in the event of another war with the Americans. Hostility simmered long after the War of 1812 but, fortunately, gradually faded into the excellent relationship our two countries enjoy today. We are long-time allies - friends and trading partners.
But what of Canada's "victory" in the War of 1812?
A number of American states, including neighbouring New York, are also holding commemorations. In Sackett's Harbor, N.Y., just west of Watertown, plans call for a memorial to be erected to mark the deaths of some 30 British and Canadian troops who died during what is known as the "Second Battle of Sackett's Harbor." It occurred on May 29, 1813 and ended in a victory for the Americans. They repulsed a British-led force who tried to capture the village. For the record, the first battle of Sackett's Harbor was a naval engagement in Lake Ontario on July 19, 1812.
There's never been any doubt on our side of the border about who won the war. The Americans on the other hand have long been reticent on the subject.
In November, during the lead-up to the anniversary year, a professor at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore (Maryland is one of the states marking the anniversary), launched a new book entitled 'Conquered Into Liberty'.
Eliot Cohen, a senior advisor to former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, says in his book that, "ultimately Canada and Canadians won the War of 1812." But he also acknowledges that, "Americans at the time and, by and large, since, did not see matters that way."
In the book Cohen argues that if the conquest of Canada was not the American goal when the war began in 1812 "it surely had become such shortly after it opened."
The author points to the successful fight staged by British, English and French speaking Canadians and their First Nations allies against what he calls "an invasion."
Cohen observes, "Not only did the colony (Canada) remain intact: It had acquired heroes, British and French, and a narrative of plucky defence against foreign invasion that helped carry it to nationhood."
A pretty stark admission coming from an American!
To me those thoughts help underline our government's position that Canadians should take part in the important commemorations which will occur over the next four years. Some of those observances will take place right here in Eastern Ontario. I plan to attend. I hope you will too!

Tuesday 24 January 2012

War of 1812 Plans Taking Shape

By Karen Robinet/Chatham This Week

Posted 16 hours ago
Regional War of 1812 Bicentennial events will begin this year, but for Chatham-Kent, 2013 will be the big year.
October 5, 2013 will mark the 200th anniversary of the Battle of the Thames and the death of Shawnee Chief Tecumseh, both significant events in the three-year conflict between the United States and the British Empire.
On June of 1812, the Americans declared war on Britain, with President James Madison assuming it would be a relatively easy task to seize Canada.
However, on July 12 of that year, American General William Hull led about 1,000 untrained militia across the Detroit River to occupy Sandwich, but by August, the Americans were forced to retreat to Detroit, where they surrendered to a force of British regulars, Canadian militia and Native Americans, led by British Major General Isaac Brock and Tecumseh.
On October 13, 1812, the Americans were defeated again at the Battle of Queenston Heights, but Brock was killed.
Tecumseh and his Indian Confederacy continued to fight with the British, but on October 5, 1813, he was killed in the Battle of the Thames and soon afterwards, the tribes of his confederacy surrendered at Detroit.
• To commemorate the occasion, the battle will be re-created at its actual site at the Tecumseh Monument just outside of Thamesville on Saturday, Oct. 5.
The event is being organized by a committee headed up by Dr. Mark Dickerson, and has been in the works for a couple of years already.
Dickerson said holding the event on the actual site does pose some logistical challenges, as there will be no on-site parking.
However, plans are underway to organize shuttle buses to bring in the crowds, which he anticipates will number at least 5,000.
A similar event was held in Thamesville in 1988 and attracted that many visitors, and Dickerson anticipates the bicentennial will mean much larger crowds.
“Ten thousand would be great,” he said.
The Battle of the Thames has been designated the ‘signature event,’ for the Southwest Ontario region, one of seven in Ontario involved in the bicentennial.
Dickerson said he anticipates staging the event will cost approximately $200,000 and committee members are seeking federal and provincial monies to help defray those costs.
Even so, he anticipates about $60,000 will still need to be raised through sponsorships, private donations and a local fundraising drive.
There are also plans for an education day on October 4, which will be open to schoolchildren.
The committee is working with the Essex and Kent Scottish Regiment and Dickerson said the Kentucky National Guard is looking at sending representation to the event.
As well a large number of re-enactors will be taking part in the battle re-creation.
And, while local residents may not all be aware of its significance, Dickerson said, “the Battle of the Thames was a very important point of history to the Americans.”
He also said there’s confusion over the fact the commemoration is being held in 2013, rather than this year.
“A lot of people ask me, ‘why are you doing this in 2013? It’s the War of 1812.’ But, the war lasted three years, until 1815,” he said.
Dickerson said in the actual battle, the British were only on the field for 15 to 20 minutes before they were overrun by the Americans, “and then the battle between the Americans and the native forces lasted probably at least an hour after that.”
However, the re-creation will likely last approximately 45 minutes, and will include the death of Tecumseh.
And, while the original battle occurred in the late evening/early afternoon, its re-creation will likely be held mid-afternoon, Dickerson said.
Volunteers in a number of areas are still needed, and anyone interested in becoming involved can contact Dickerson by email at mdickerson1@cogeco.ca. Plans are also underway to launch a website at www.battleofthethames.ca in the very near future, and a Battle of the Thames page is already set up on Facebook. A Twitter account is available @BattleofThames.
• Meanwhile, the Friends of the Tecumseh Monument committee is poised to unveil its plans for a more permanent bicentennial project.
On January 26, the committee will launch its $5 million public fundraising campaign, a campaign committee chair Lisa Gilbert said will be national in scope, given Tecumseh’s significant role in Canadian history.
The committee has already commissioned an ambitious master plan, which calls for a major redevelopment of the current site where the Battle of the Thames took place and where Tecumseh died.
In addition to a new monument to Tecumseh, the redevelopment will also incorporate the existing monument, and include a boat-shaped river overview, orientation area, expanded parking lot, program areas and an open-air museum.
While the estimated cost of the project is $4.2 million, Gilbert said the committee has set its sights on raising $5 million to cover future site maintenance costs.
Gilbert said, “we’re hopeful we’re going to get some federal money, but we’re not ready to apply.”
She said that the committee is in a Catch-22 situation where it needs money to get detailed schematic drawings to apply for grants, “but we don’t have the money to do that. We need money of any sort.
“Our plan has always been to go national,” with the fundraising effort, she said. “Hopefully we can get some interest from corporations and maybe some foundations.”
“The story of Tecumseh is a national and international story,” she said. “People in Chatham-Kent don’t realize the importance of Tecumseh because there isn’t a lot at the site where he died.
“That’s our goal, to put something there that’s commensurate with his worth as an international and national hero.”
The monument sits on municipally-owned land and Gilbert said council has already committed $40,000 in seed money. However, she said the necessary drawings could cost up to $75,000.
Gilbert admits the redevelopment plan is “a very ambitious thing,” but said the group has already been working on the project for three years.
“I’m confident we’ll be able to build something, perhaps not the vision we have now, but we’ll certainly build something, and right now I’m pretty confident,” she said.
• Charlene Houle of Chatham-Kent’s tourism department was at the Tecumseh Monument last week with the Canadian bureau chief for The Wall Street Journal.
Chip Cummings is working on an article about how the War of 1812 Bicentennial is being marked in both the U.S. and Canada and visited some of the local sites relevant to the war.
Houle said she’s pleased with the way things are moving along in Chatham-Kent, especially, “in terms of where we started.”
Houle said there is a lot of interest in Chatham-Kent, and she said, “Tecumseh is huge in the States.”
His death is depicted on a frieze at the Rotunda of the United States Capitol building.
And, she said, the play Tecumseh! has been running every summer in Chillicothe, Ohio for 40 years. Since the outdoor show was first performed in 1973, over 2.5 million people have seen it.
According to its website those attending the show can, “witness the epic life story of the legendary Shawnee leader as he struggles to defend his sacred homelands in the Ohio country during the late 1700s. Tecumseh has been labeled as one of the most mesmerizing dramas in the nation.”
Houle said Chatham-Kent is very fortunate in that it has authenticity on its side.
“We have authentic space,” she said.
She said the Battle of the Thames was “the biggest battle in this region and the death of Tecumseh was a real turning point.”
The War of 1812 witnessed, “the founding of a nation,” and was the beginning of modern-day Canada.
• Another project, the Tecumseh Parkway is already underway.
The project is being developed by Dave Benson, and will become part of the provincial Route 1812.
The driving route will run along the Thames River, connecting many sites of cultural, historic and natural interest.
Benson has said the Battle of the Thames and the subsequent loss of Tecumseh’s Indian confederacy paved the way for American expansion into what had been traditional native lands.
“We shouldn’t underestimate how important the events that happened here were and how well-known south of the border,” he said.
He believes the parkway has the potential to become a key tourist draw for Americans, and said it will ultimately incorporate the area’s black history, as well as its agricultural, francophone and First Nations history.
As well as the Tecumseh Monument, stops along the parkway will include Tecumseh Park in Chatham, the Thomas McCrae House and the Fairfield Museum.
The pull-offs at the various stops are being done and signage is being looked into.
“A lot of the stops will have peace gardens,” Houle said.
• The regional website for the War of 1812 Bicentennial can be found at www.1812ontario.ca

Friday 20 January 2012

HMS Hunter 1812

Flag of ship captured in rare U.S. victory in 1812 to fly again

SOUTHAMPTON — Wearing blue rubber gloves, Ken Cassavoy is carefully unfolding a threadbare flag on a boardroom table at the Bruce County Museum & Cultural Centre.
Though greatly faded, the red, white and blue of a British Red Ensign are clearly visible — a Union Jack in the top left-hand corner, surrounded by a sea of red.
This is the first time Cassavoy has unpacked the flag since he fetched it home on loan from Annapolis, Md., where for two centuries it has been a war trophy at the U.S. Naval Academy Museum.
As flags go, the ensign isn’t shy. It’s nearly 8 feet tall and is still almost 10 feet long, even after being shortened by about 4 feet when, at some point, the naval museum put a linen backing on it.
Its return for a public unveiling this week marks a kind of crowning moment, both for Cassavoy and the War of 1812 fighting vessel that had flown this flag before being captured by the Americans. Three years later, the ship was run ashore, barely a stone’s throw from Southampton’s main street.
Not that any of this was known back in 2001, when low water levels on Lake Huron and retreating ice conspired to expose the tips of what were clearly the ribs of a wooden ship.
“There are 50 wrecks in this area, so we had no idea what it was,” says Cassavoy, a marine archeologist. “We thought it was two or three other vessels for a while.”
Among the possibilities: a merchant schooner, the Weazell, lost at Southampton in 1798.
But in the archeological equivalent of CSI meets Antiques Roadshow, the evidence soon started pointing in another direction.
Preliminary excavations in 2001 and 2002 revealed a mast step, essentially the bracket that helps secure the mast to the bottom of the boat. Arrayed around it were stones used as ballast — 472 stones, to be exact, weighing 10,246 pounds in a subsequent tally.
A full excavation was completed in 2004, though not without mishap. Because the ship’s remains are so close to the shoreline, a temporary berm had been constructed to keep waves from washing onto the site. But after three weeks of digging, the berm gave way, and within two hours the ship was completely reburied.
Once a sturdier berm of massive concrete blocks had been put in place, the digging began again in earnest, carried out by roughly 200 volunteers and spearheaded by the Southampton Marine Heritage Society. What they found gradually helped solve the mystery.
The vessel itself, fashioned out of oak, would have originally measured about 54 feet long at the keel by 18 feet wide at midship, with two masts.
Buried in the sand with it were a small cannon, four cannon balls meant for larger cannons, military buttons from the likes of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment, parts of a musket, a bayonet, an officer’s walking stick, a wooden deadeye used in the ship’s rigging, and pieces of a shoe.
Spread among all that were 194 ceramic shards from plates, cups, saucers, soup bowls and a tankard.
The artifacts discovered, and some additional sleuthing at the U.S. National Archives in Washington, D.C., eventually told an epic saga of war and peace.
Originally dubbed HMS General Hunter, the ship had been built for the Provincial Marine at Amherstburg, Upper Canada, and was launched in 1806. Classed as a brig, she was capable of carrying up to 10 cannons, and may have had close to that during the Battle of Lake Erie, which was a rare high point for the Americans.
Though outnumbered, the British had sailed with six ships, including General Hunter, to engage their nine American counterparts in September 1813, in a decisive battle for control of the lake.
But the wind, which initially favoured the British, started shifting almost as soon as the battle began, and after three hours of carnage, the Americans had won the day.
General Hunter was now in U.S. hands, and while it’s unclear whether the ship saw further action, what is known is that after the war she served as a transport vessel, her name shortened to Hunter.
According to documents that only came to light in 2005, Hunter was sailing from Michilimackinac to Detroit in 1816 when a violent storm on Lake Huron threw the ship off course.
Fearing for their lives, the crew of eight opted to “put the helm hard a weather and run her in head foremost” toward the sandy beach of Southampton, according to the crew’s subsequent affidavit. Everyone on board survived, including two passengers.
In an 1816 letter, a U.S. general reports that two boats were later sent to salvage what they could, then set the wreck alight. Whatever remained was eventually submerged in sand for the better part of two centuries. “No one had any idea it was there,” says Cassavoy.
Now the story of the General Hunter is taking pride of place as a centrepiece of the Bruce County Museum, where volunteers are busy building a slightly smaller replica of the ship’s deck.
And what’s become of the original ship’s remains?
“The oak is in very good shape,” says Cassavoy. But the cost of removing General Hunter and putting her in climate-controlled storage would run into the millions of dollars.
That left only one option: burying the ship once again in the wet sand that had preserved her so well, and for so long.

See pictures link below

http://www.therecord.com/news/local/article/657309--flag-of-ship-captured-in-rare-u-s-victory-in-1812-to-fly-again



Record news services

The Local Experience of War

Jordan exhibit recounts life in War of 1812


The local experience of war. Lincoln mayor Bill Hodgson and curator Helen Booth cut the ribbon on a new exhibit at the Jordan Historical Museum of the Twenty on Jan. 12.
The Jordan Historical Museum of the Twenty has opened a new exhibit that recount local experiences in the War of 1812. Yet, unlike similar exhibits and events around Niagara that mark the bicentennial of the war, this one celebrates life on the home front, the dedicated pacifism of the Mennonite community, and the bold contributions made to the war effort by black residents. The exhibit opened on Jan. 12, and will remain in place for the rest of the year. Curator Helen Booth said the exhibit is something unique.
“We’re doing something different from every other museum, because Lincoln doesn’t have the record of any military excursions or actions. We decided to take a totally different look at it. We wanted to be sure to show our differences,” said Booth.
The three-panel exhibit details daily life, the pacifism of the Mennonite settlers, and the actions of some locals who did go to war, including black settlers who helped formed a battalion. Lincoln mayor Bill Hodgson, speaking at the opening of the exhibit, said Lincoln’s history stands apart, and thus required a unique presentation.
“There’s a special place in history that the town fills. Everybody who lived in the area was affected by the war in one way or another. There was no real record of conflict being fought within the town of Lincoln, and it was clear it’s right to highlight the pacifist doctrines of many of the settlers. We can only imagine them in the face of a pretty violent conflict, living as pacifists, and Mennonites are still doing that around the world,” he said.
The Mennonite settlers had a greater dedication to God than to king or causes, and had only recently come to Canada from the United States. Handmade Bibles and hymnals decorated with traditional “Fraktur” art are on display. The dedication to pacifisim was difficult in a time when prejudices between the new nations ran high, but according to Bev Davie, chair of the museum’s volunteer association, the Mennonites of Lincoln by and large displayed an attitude of charity to soldiers on both sides of the conflict.
“They shared their food and everything with both sides. It was interesting,” she said.
A final panel of the exhibit shows evidence of how life carried on during the war, providing documents and excerpts from personal accounts that show how the war did not prevent commerce and family life.
“Life goes on. There’s indentures and business documents and things to show that the human spirit keeps on going,” said Booth.
The Jordan Historical Museum of the Twenty is located at 3802 Main St., in Jordan.

War of 1812 Bicentennial a Significant Landmark

Jan 19, 2012 By Jeff Maguire
EMC Lifestyle - As a history buff I am always interested in anniversaries of major events which have occurred over the course of time.
My wife and I spend a lot of time in the United Kingdom and since both of us love history it's a great destination. There are literally more historic connections around every corner in Great Britain and Continental Europe!
In terms of world history North America remains one of the new kids on the block. This continent was settled relatively recently. Although our history is intrinsically tied to that of Europe, simply because our ancestors came mainly from that continent, we can't begin to match the number of historic sites and buildings available overseas.
On the other hand our shorter history is intriguing and because it is fresh it is also relatively well documented, something that offers a huge advantage to students for instance.
Last spring I wrote a column to coincide with the opening shots of the American Civil War fired 150 years earlier. The Sesquicentennial of the conflict between North and South is being observed over the course of four years, ending in April 2015.
The Civil War began with the shelling (by Confederate artillery) of Union-held Fort Sumter in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina, April 12, 1861. It ended almost exactly four years later when Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union General Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia on April 9, 1865.
The Americans are marking the Sesquicentennial with a variety of events which will continue until the anniversary of the surrender more than three years from now.
The year that just dawned marks the Bicentennial (200th anniversary) of yet another four-year long war which, although it involved the United States, was far more significant to Canada and Canadians. The 'War of 1812' was the last war ever fought between our neighbouring countries although, officially, Canada didn't become an independent nation until 55 years later.
I can't profess to be extremely knowledgeable about the War of 1812 although I probably possess far more background than most Canadians. My mother grew up in Stoney Creek, Ontario near Hamilton and some of the most significant fighting of the war occurred in the Niagara region. Very early in life I learned about Major General Isaac Brock and the Battle of Queenston Heights. It's a lesson which has stuck with me through my life.
For the record that particular conflict, the first major battle of the war, occurred on Oct. 13, 1812 at Queenston, five kilometres from Niagara Falls. It was a British victory, but Brock was one of more than 120 (from both sides) who died during the fighting.
Brock's monument, a landmark at Queenston, is getting a facelift for the Bicentennial.
MAJOR EVENT
Not surprisingly the Canadian government is putting a major emphasis on this particular anniversary. They want us to remember and honour how Canadians from diverse backgrounds and various regions came together to fight and ensure the eventual independent destiny of this country.
The truth is that if the War of 1812 (it lasted until 1815) had not ended in victory for the British and their allies, Canada would not exist. The objective of the Americans was to defeat the same enemy they had beaten in the Revolutionary War. To me it stands to reason they would then have expanded into what remained of British North America (Upper and Lower Canada). Eventually it's almost certain Americans would have colonized the remainder of what is now this country.
So, a significant anniversary indeed!
Personally I believe in "fighting" one battle at a time. So no, I won't be railing against the education system for failing to teach our young people details of the War of 1812. To be honest I'm not sure how much - or how little - of this particular chapter in Canadian history is being taught in our schools?
On the other hand I would consider it a major victory if the system did a better job of teaching the more recent history of the two world wars. The wars of the 20th Century, after all, impacted on many Canadians who are still living. Yet recent polls show the majority of young Canadians know little or nothing about wars which shaped the modern world they now live in. This general lack of knowledge is a national disgrace in my opinion!
Most Canadians will also tell you that we have been fortunate "never to have a major war fought on our soil."
I think it's a matter of definition.
In modern times at least our country and our continent have been fortunate to avoid the direct impact of war. But with so many Canadian lives sacrificed during the wars of the 20th Century it would be very wrong to say "we escaped the effects of war."
As for the War of 1812, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government are definitely taking the anniversary seriously.
A significant budget of $28 million has been put in place and will be used over the course of the next four years. Included in the War of 1812 project is an educational campaign (something I welcome), the re-enactment of historic battles, festivals centred on the war as well as a permanent memorial which will be erected in the Ottawa region.
In addition infrastructure work, including upgrades to historic forts which played a role in the conflict and existing memorials (including Brock's monument) will be undertaken.
Plans also call for the issuance of stamps and coins to mark the Bicentennial of the war.
In a statement late last year Harper said the war was instrumental in establishing Canada's military. He noted that many militia regiments still in existence in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes can trace their roots back to the War of 1812.
"The war helped establish our path toward becoming an independent and free country, united under the Crown with a respect for linguistic and ethnic diversity," Harper says.
"The heroic efforts of Canadians then helped define who we are today, what side of the border we live on and which flag we salute," the PM states.
There is no doubt that despite the fact it wasn't a major conflict by world standards, the War of 1812 had a huge impact on our country from military, political and cultural points of view. The result helped lay the foundation for Canadian Confederation in 1867, not to mention Canada's border with the U.S. The imaginary line we like to call "the longest undefended border in the world."
Clearly it wasn't always so!
The Rideau Canal, now a UNESCO World Heritage Site, was built by Colonel John By (the founder of Ottawa) and the Royal Engineers, for defensive purposes. Opened in 1832 it was constructed as a precaution to facilitate the movement of troops and supplies in the event of another war with the Americans. Hostility simmered long after the War of 1812 but, fortunately, gradually faded into the excellent relationship our two countries enjoy today. We are long-time allies - friends and trading partners.
But what of Canada's "victory" in the War of 1812?
A number of American states, including neighbouring New York, are also holding commemorations. In Sackett's Harbor, N.Y., just west of Watertown, plans call for a memorial to be erected to mark the deaths of some 30 British and Canadian troops who died during what is known as the "Second Battle of Sackett's Harbor." It occurred on May 29, 1813 and ended in a victory for the Americans. They repulsed a British-led force who tried to capture the village. For the record, the first battle of Sackett's Harbor was a naval engagement in Lake Ontario on July 19, 1812.
There's never been any doubt on our side of the border about who won the war. The Americans on the other hand have long been reticent on the subject.
In November, during the lead-up to the anniversary year, a professor at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore (Maryland is one of the states marking the anniversary), launched a new book entitled 'Conquered Into Liberty'.
Eliot Cohen, a senior advisor to former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, says in his book that, "ultimately Canada and Canadians won the War of 1812." But he also acknowledges that, "Americans at the time and, by and large, since, did not see matters that way."
In the book Cohen argues that if the conquest of Canada was not the American goal when the war began in 1812 "it surely had become such shortly after it opened."
The author points to the successful fight staged by British, English and French speaking Canadians and their First Nations allies against what he calls "an invasion."
Cohen observes, "Not only did the colony (Canada) remain intact: It had acquired heroes, British and French, and a narrative of plucky defence against foreign invasion that helped carry it to nationhood."
A pretty stark admission coming from an American!
To me those thoughts help underline our government's position that Canadians should take part in the important commemorations which will occur over the next four years. Some of those observances will take place right here in Eastern

Tall Shipp to Join 1812 Festival

ESSEX, Ont. -- Essex council has agreed to spend $25,000 on War of 1812 bicentennial celebrations budget.
Committee chairwoman Linda Iler said the committee won’t be able to do as much as it planned, but the funding from the town should secure a visit to Colchester Harbour by tall ships.
The War of 1812 bicentennial committee wants to bring in tall ships over two weekends in July.
The events from July 20 to 30 includes several cruises on the tall ships, a youth sail over three days with an overnight stay on Pelee Island, another youth sail to Amherstburg where tall ships will join the three-day Roots to Boots Festival on the August long weekend.
The tall ships will cost $12,000, while dredging Colchester harbour to accommodate the ships will be another $4,000. The budget also included $1,500 for re-enactors to put on a drama show in co-ordination with the ships.
Event officials also want to design a peace garden at the corner of Dunn Road and County Road 50, on the north side.
The only cost associated with the peace garden approved was the funding was $7,500 for an architect.
Coun. Bill Baker said he wasn’t comfortable approving the County Road 50 site because there hadn’t been a traffic study or analysis of the property use by staff.
Deputy Mayor Richard Meloche opposed the development of the property for a peace garden because he said the town bought the land for light commercial development.
Coun. John Scott pointed out council has already approved the peace garden location in principle at a past meeting. The majority of the development of the peace garden will be done in 2013 and staff will come back in a year for a funding request for that portion of the War of 1812 bicentennial events


Read more: http://www.windsorstar.com/life/Tall+ships+join+1812+festival/6021872/story.html#ixzz1k1wU06Yf

Bicentennial committee receives permission to fly flag during celebrations

By Sarah Ferguson

Posted 1 day ago
Jim Alexander and Rick Meloen's vision for Queen Street will become a reality.
The members of the Niagara-on-the-Lake 1812 Bicentennial Committee asked councillors last week for permission to fly a newly-designed flag in the Old Town.
The bicentennial flag features a soldier, with the words Niagara-on-the-Lake and the years 1812 and 2012.
It will be flown along side the Canadian flag and the Union Jack on three concrete poles in the Old Town and the bicentennial committee will be responsible for replacing the flags if they become tattered or torn.
Lord Mayor David Eke said he supported having the flag to represent NOTL and the bicentennial celebrations.
"The flags will also reflect the re-enactment of the American occupation and the Union Jack will be replaced with a period American flag."
The flags are expected to be displayed for three years until the end of the celebration in 2014.

New collector coin 1812-2012

Canadian Silver Dollar Celebrates Bicentennial of the War of 1812

The Royal Canadian Mint has announced their first collector coin of the year, the 2012 Proof Silver Dollar celebrating the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812.

The coin is designed by military artist Ardell Bourgeois of British Columbia and features a British Sergeant, a Voltigeur Canadian, and an Iroquois warrior united in defense of their border. Behind the group is a map depicting part of the Great Lakes and Southwestern Ontario. The reverse design is encircled by 200 beads near the rim to symbolize the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812.
The obverse design features the effigy of Queen Elizabeth II, designed by Susanna Blunt in 2003.
The 2012 Silver Dollars are struck in 99.99% silver with a weight of 23.17 grams and diameter of 36.07 mm. The proof version of the coin is limited to a mintage of 40,000 and available for $59.95 CDN. The brilliant version of the coin is limited to 25,000 and available for $54.95 CDN.
The Royal Canadian Mint will also include the 2012 Proof Silver Dollar in two types of proof sets. The 2012 Silver Dollar Proof Set includes the silver dollar with every circulating denomination struck in solid alloys. These sets are limited to 40,000 and priced at $99.95 CDN. The 2012 Fine Silver Proof Set will include a selectively gold plated silver dollar with every circulating denomination struck in 99.99% silver.
For additional information or ordering, visit the RCM’s website at http://mint.ca/

Monday 16 January 2012

Niagara Falls Levee

By TONY RICCIUTO / Niagara Falls Review

TONY RICCIUTO Niagara Falls Review Niagara Falls Mayor Jim Diodati, on the left, is joined by Justice Minister and Attorney General of Canada Rob Nicholson and Niagara Falls MPP Kim Craitor at a joint New Years Levee celebration held Saturday at the Gale Centre in Niagara Falls.
We can only read about the War of 1812 in history books, but those who attended the New Year’s Levee in Niagara Falls witnessed a bit of their own history in the making.
It was the first time that representatives from all three levels of government, all uniquely dressed in period costumes, held a joint New Year’s Levee celebration.
Niagara Falls Mayor Jim Diodati, who was dressed as a businessman of the day, reminded everyone that we have so much to be grateful for and that we should ever take what we have for granted.
He noted that many people made sacrifices and commitments, some even gave their lives, so that we can enjoy what we have today in Canada.
The event was held from 10 a.m. to noon on Saturday at the Gale Centre where visitors were treated with music, entertainment and food.
The Levee was the first of many events planned by the city of Niagara Falls, volunteers and numerous organizations to commemorate the Bicentennial of the War of 1812.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Rob Nicholson, who was dressed as a lawyer from that era, said getting dressed was a bit of an operation with suspenders and a frilly shirt.
“I can’t remember ever having this much attention with anything I’ve ever worn. You go with 30 years of wearing blue suits,” said Nicholson, adding he wasn’t too keen about dressing as someone from the military because they tend to get shot.
Nicholson said we have a lot to celebrate because this was a significant moment in our history.
“After that war it was never called into question again whether Canada would have a separate existence. This is a celebration worth having, worth commemorating, and worth investing in.”
Niagara Falls MPP Kim Craitor, who was dressed as a captain from a Swiss regiment, said many people who came to Canada from other countries ended up fighting in the war.
“This is an authentic uniform, it’s valued at about $1,500 so I’m being very careful not to spill coffee on it. It’s an honour to be wearing it. The pants are made of wool and what I know for sure is that if you need to use the washroom there are 16 buttons that you have to undo.”
Jim Hill, manager of Heritage Operations with the Niagara Parks Commission, said he was amazed to see the detailed work that went into making some of the costumes.
“The mayor and his family look like they stepped out of a Jane Austen novel, they really look sharp. Some people have even adopted the name of a historic figure and that’s pretty cool because they learn who the person was and what life was like for them.”
Some of the other dignitaries who were dressed in costumes included Gary Burroughs, chairman of Regional Niagara, Lord Mayor Dave Eke from Niagara-on-the-Lake, Brian Merrett, CEO with the Niagara 1812 Bicentennial Legacy Council, Town Crier Derek Tidd and Sherman Zavitz, historian for the city of Niagara Falls.
Other upcoming 1812 Bicentennial events include The Great Niagara Portage Adventure on June 9, Chime the Bells at Christ Church on June 16, the Battle of Chippawa Commemorative Service on July 5, and the opening of the Niagara Falls History Museum on July 21.

Wednesday 11 January 2012

Lion and Eagle by Dominion Reperatory Theatre

The eve of war on the stage

Original play kicks off Fort’s bicentennial events





The eve of war on the stage. The cast of The Lion and the Eagle, an original play set on the eve of the War of 1812, breathe a sigh of relief after a great opening night at the Old Fort on Saturday. Pictured from left are, back row: Darka Makarec, Dan Bennett, John Johnston, Carson John, Andrew Martin, Katie Howard, and Mayor Doug Martin, front row: John Dickhout, Andrea Morgan and Marcie Young.
So the Yanks and the Brits aren’t getting along, what else is new.
Abner Moody is not going to let a little thing like the threat of impending war stop him from opening his tavern to the patrons of Fort Erie.
It’s the yuletide season and Moody is determined to give people one last party to close out 1811.
With his daughter Mimi on the fiddle, the entire bar is alive with dancing, laughter, singing, and one huge explosion.
Despite a sign on the way into the theatre which warned of loud noises, a large chunk of the audience still jumped out of their seats when the crack of musket fire rang through the Old Fort during the opening night of the new play The Lion and the Eagle on Saturday night.
The explosion stood as a divider between two completely separate experiences contained within the same play.
The first act is a fourth-wall breaking, semi-interactive play/singalong/concert consisting mostly of light-hearted fare and amusing conversations with the audience, who are seated all around the the stage rather in front of it.
At one point, a “patron” of Moody’s Bar stumbled over to Mayor Doug Martin, seated near the back of the audience, and began to harass him about getting the proper permits for a new outhouse he wants to build.
It seems even 200 years ago, developers in Fort Erie had trouble getting approval for their projects.
The comedy comes to a speedy halt when the two Americans who fired the musket into Moody’s Tavern are caught and dragged into the middle of the stage. After that things take a sharp left turn down a much darker path.
Moody — played spectacularly by Dan Bennett — is now tasked with trying to control the rag-tag group of patrons at the bar, each with their own idea of what should be done with the Americans.
Everyone from soldiers and civilians to First Nations’ people and Quakers weigh in on the consequences of war, culminating in an appearance from Sir Isaac Brock, played by Xander Warrender.
Heavy subjects like slavery, war, execution, and religion are all discussed but never in a ham-fisted manner. The discussions take place in the realm of 1811 but through the progressive filter of today.
Like Mrs. Baker; when one of the male characters tries to dismiss Mrs. Baker’s opinion as useless because she is a woman — something very likely to happen at the time — she is quick to put him back line — something very unlikely to happen at the time —  and comes off as a very modern and empowered woman throughout the play.
And when the conversation veers into the murky waters of slavery, the patrons of Moody’s Tavern are quick to condemn the Americans for their use slaves, while at the same time acknowledging their countries own dark past.
It’s that attention to detail, provided by historians Joseph Lischka and Charlie Capern, combined with the sharp and thoughtful writing from Brian Cotsworth that make The Lion and the Eagle a real treat to take in.
Saturday night’s performance also contained a special surprise for the opening night audience; Mayor Martin came back at the end of the night in full period costume and played a roll that really stretched his acting abilities to their limits: the mayor of Fort Erie.
As Mayor of Fort Erie from the past he read the declaration of war, then seamlessly switching to present day mayor, he declared the start of the celebrations of the bicentennial of the war he had just declared a moment earlier.
It was all a bit confusing but certainly a fun ride nonetheless.
And as for the fate of those two captured yanks; well, you’ll just have to check out the play for yourself to find out.
The Lion and the Eagle continues every Saturday at 8 p.m. and Sunday at 6 p.m. for the entire month of January. Tickets are available at Benjamin Moore Paints, visit forterie1812.ca for pricing and more information.

Monday 2 January 2012

NEW YEAR'S DAY LEVEE: We're going to party like it's 1812

By Grant LaFleche and Don Fraser QMI Agency

Updated 2 days ago
The official start of the War of 1812 bicentennial celebrations isn't until June, when events mark the declaration of war between Britain and the United States.
But for local re-enactors and history buffs, things get underway Sunday during the New Year's Day levee at Fort George in Niagara-on-the-Lake.
"It is the unofficial kickoff, really," said Katie Farr, spokeswoman for the Niagara 1812 Bicentennial Legacy Council.
Farr said the annual Fort George levee, hosted by the Friends of Fort George, will have extra punch this time because Lt. Gov. David Onley will be holding his own levee there.
"There will be a receiving line, where anyone who comes can meet the lieutenant governor," Farr said.
"All the buildings at the site will be open for visitors, so Parks Canada staff will be out in force."
Farr said because of extra attractions and Onley's presence, the levee is flagged as a "signature event" by the bicentennial council, even if official celebrations are months away.
The war began on June 18, 1812, and lasted nearly three years.
It launched a battle for control of North America between British and American forces.
Some key battles were fought on Niagara soil in areas such as Fort Erie, Niagara Falls and Queenston.
A negotiated peace was finally reached that left the borders of the U.S. and Canada unchanged.

Brian Merrett, CEO of the bicentennial council, said events marking the conflict should serve as a big boost to heritage tourism in the region.
"It's a unique opportunity to celebrate 200 years of peace," said Merrett. "It will also let people recognize what an important role in our history that Niagara played."
Hundreds are helping organize events in Niagara, Merrett said. "Every community has 1812 working committees that vary in size."
As for re-enactors, it's the start of a busy three years at sites made famous by the pivotal war.
On Sunday, they're expected to be at Fort George to give visitors a sense of what life was like there 200 years ago.
John Sek of Fort Erie is among many making that history come to life. His role is as a captain of the 2nd Lincoln Artillery Unit, which was active in the conflict.
"It will be a busy year, and actually the next three years will be busy," said Sek, adding there's been much co-ordination to ensure re-enactors aren't overlapping from one event to the next.
As for the various War of 1812 sites, "we all have different stories," he said.
"We all have different approaches as to what the purpose was of all this," Sek said, adding another important story is how a peaceful outcome was finally achieved.
"Telling people history is one thing," said Sek, also a member of the Fort Erie War of 1812 Bicentennial Committee. "But (it's also) for the public to reflect on why this happened and what the result was.
"Canadians got kicked and we realized we couldn't stay as a colony. Canada had to become its own nation."
"And that happened."
The Fort George levee on Sunday starts at 1 p.m. and runs to 4 p.m. Light refreshments will be served, with a cannon salute at 3 p.m. Everyone is welcome. Some events will be outdoors, so dress accordingly.
Other War of 1812 event highlights for this year
An opening ceremonies weekend is planned throughout Niagara to mark the June 18, 1812, declaration of war
A major parade in Fort Erie in June, with more than 50 military bands invited
Siege of Fort Erie in August, presented by the Niagara Parks Commission — one of the largest re-enactments in Canada.
* Battle of Queenston Heights and burial of General Isaac Brock re-enactments in October
For more information, visit www.discover1812.com or www.visit1812.com



Lt. Gov. kicks off 1812 celebrationsBy SHAWN JEFFORDS Standard StaffUpdated 17 hours agoNIAGARA-ON-THE-LAKE -- The kick-off of bicentennial celebrations of the War of 1812 commemorate 200 years of peace between two great nations, not the bloody conflict itself.So says Ontario's Lt. Gov. David Onley who hosted a New Year's Day Levee at Fort George. The Queen's representative in Ontario, told a crowd of hundreds packed into a large tent on the fort's grounds that it's important to remember the conflict and recognize its historic link to the Niagara Region."New Year's Day 200 years ago events were already in motion that would change our nation forever," he said after a series of toasts to the Queen, the US president and Canada's armed forces.The Lieutenant Governor hosts a levee every year and said he knew two years ago that he wanted to move the celebration out of Toronto to Fort George to celebrate the bicentennial. "In effect, we are launching the bicentennial of the War of 1812 today," he told the crowd.The levee featured people dressed in period costume, performances by a fife and drum band and the traditional booming cannon salute. Onley told the crowd that the conflict marked the beginning of Canada's proud military history. But the resolution
 of the war and subsequent long peace also underscores the importance of the relationship between the Canada and the United States, he said."Peace is truly attainable to people of goodwill," he said.Jarred Picher, acting field unit superintendent for Parks Canada, said the event was a great way to start bicentennial celebrations which will take place over the next two years at more than 20 War of 1812 historic sites. "For Parks Canada, this is about raising awareness for the national treasures we're here to protect," he said. "Fort George is going to be one of the flagship historic sites for the bicentennial and we look forward to greeting as many guests and visitors as we can."Picher said he was impressed by the large turnout, who braved cold rains and high winds to attend the levee. "I'm overwhelmed by the number of people who've come out," he said. "It's a testament to the Lieutenant Governor I think."Picher said the bicentennial will connect a whole new generation of Canadians to the history of the War of 1812."Even if history isn't your interest, being Canadian is something we're all proud of and for Canadians to connect to the places and the stories and the people that helped shape this great nation, you can't ask for anything more profound than that."Robert Andree made the trip to the fort from Wellandport Sunday. The history buff said it's important to commemorate the conflict."I find it all very interesting," he said. "Canadians should know more about our history."Levees date back to the 18th century and were brought to Canada by the Royal Governor of New France who would sit on his doorstep New Year's Day-morning to greet citizens.The Lincoln and Welland Regiment and 10th Battery, 56th Field Regiment also hosted a New Year's Levee Sunday. They opened the doors of the Lake Street Armoury to the public and helped usher in the new year with some help from local politicians. "The goal of the day is to connect with the community," said Lt. Col Allan Stoyka. The festivities are just that much more important as the people begin to celebrate the bicentennial of the War of 1812. The regiments all fought in battles during the conflict."As Canadians we're shy when it comes to talking about our heritage," he said. "But it's one of the common things we share as a people ... and it's good to celebrate that connection to the past."10th Battery commander Capt. Jim Hill said the levee acts as a reunion for current members of the service and veterans who have moved on. "It's a great old tradition and it's good to have everyone home," he said.sjeffords@stcatharinesstandard.ca